COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED VS. VENTILATOR-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TREATMENT OUTCOMES

Main Article Content

Dr. V. C. Patil, Dr. Sanjaykumar S. Patil, Dr. Satish V. Kakade

Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP) are significant causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite being distinct entities with different etiologies and risk factors, a comparative analysis of their treatment outcomes is crucial for optimizing patient care and resource allocation. This paper aims to review and analyze existing literature on the treatment outcomes of CAP and VAP, focusing on mortality rates, length of hospital stay, complications, recurrence rates, and prevention strategies. By understanding the similarities and differences in the management of these two types of pneumonia, healthcare providers can tailor treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of these infections.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dr. Satish V. Kakade, D. V. C. P. D. S. S. P. (2024). COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED VS. VENTILATOR-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TREATMENT OUTCOMES. Obstetrics and Gynaecology Forum, 34(3s), 275–283. Retrieved from http://obstetricsandgynaecologyforum.com/index.php/ogf/article/view/280
Section
Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.